Skip to main content
Home UNEP Judicial Portal

For judges by judges in support of environmental issues

Main navigation

  • Jurisprudence
    • Browse jurisprudence
    • Submit Jurisprudence
  • Judicial Network
  • Glossary
  • Resources
    • E-Learning
    • Training materials
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Legislation

User account menu

  • Log in

Glossary

  1. Home
  2. International Law
  3. Principles of Environmental Law
  4. Environmental Democracy
  5. Access to Justice

Access to Justice

[...] Effective access to judicial and administrative proceedings, including redress and remedy, shall be provided (Source: Rio Principle 10)

Related jurisprudence

Grimkovskaya v. Ukraine.

Strasbourg
European Union
July 21, 2011

Union of Swiss Senior Women for Climate Protection vs. Swiss Federal Council and Others

St. Gallen
Switzerland
November 27, 2018

Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India Thru' Secy. Ministry Of Defence & Ors.

India
April 12, 2005

Company Secretary of ArcelorMittal South Africa vs. Vaal Environmental Justice Alliance

Bloemfontein
South Africa
November 26, 2014

Birkett v DEFRA

London
United Kingdom
December 21, 2011

Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v. Ministerstvo ivotného prostredia Slovenskej republiky

Luxembourg
European Union
March 8, 2011

Delta Electricity v Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc.

Australia
October 18, 2010

Kenya Association of Manufacturers & 2 others v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources & 3 others [2017] eKLR

Nairobi
Kenya
August 25, 2017

Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia.

Australia
September 1, 2010

North East Pylon Pressure Campaign Ltd vs. Ministry for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources

Luxembourg
Ireland
March 15, 2018

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Next page ››
Supported by the InforMEA project This website is supported by and contributing to the InforMEA Project which is funded by the European Union
This website was funded
by the European Union