Skip to main content
Home UNEP Judicial Portal

For judges by judges in support of environmental issues

Main navigation

  • Jurisprudence
    • Browse jurisprudence
    • Submit Jurisprudence
  • Judicial Network
  • Glossary
  • Resources
    • E-Learning
    • Training materials
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Legislation

User account menu

  • Log in

Glossary

  1. Home
  2. Regulatory Tool
  3. Licences
  4. Permits

Permits

Related jurisprudence

Heybridge Developments Limited v Bay of Plenty Regional Council

New Zealand
August 19, 2011

Taseko Mines Limited v. Phillips

Vancouver
Canada
December 2, 2011

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al., Plaintiffs v KENNETH L. SALAZAR et al., Defendants and MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, Defendant-Intervenor.

United States of America
March 16, 2011

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION, Defendant and Appellant.

Sacramento
United States of America
September 2, 2008

Brinara Pty Ltd v Gosford City Council.

Australia
November 12, 2010

Griffiths v Minister for Lands, Planning and Environment.

Australia
May 15, 2008

Tauschke v East Gippsland SC.

Melbourne
Australia
October 26, 2009

Phosphate Resources Ltd v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts.

Sidney
Australia
October 13, 2008

Barratt South Wales v Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig.

London
United Kingdom
November 28, 2008

Utkarsh Mandal Vs. Union of India (UOI).

India
November 26, 2009

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Next page ››
Supported by the InforMEA project This website is supported by and contributing to the InforMEA Project which is funded by the European Union
This website was funded
by the European Union