Skip to main content
Home UNEP Judicial Portal

For judges by judges in support of environmental issues

Main navigation

  • Jurisprudence
    • Browse jurisprudence
    • Submit Jurisprudence
  • Judicial Network
  • Glossary
  • Resources
    • E-Learning
    • Training materials
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Legislation

User account menu

  • Log in

Glossary

  1. Home
  2. Procedure Law
  3. Evidence

Evidence

Related jurisprudence

Contact Energy Limited (Appellant) v. The Waikato Regional Council ant The Taupo District Council (Respondents)

New Zealand
January 24, 2000

Department of Environment & Resource Management v Clark.

Southport
Australia
March 3, 2011

Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. United States.

United States of America
July 12, 2012

Delta Electricity v Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc.

Australia
October 18, 2010

Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia.

Australia
September 1, 2010

Cessnock City Council v Quintaz Pty Limited; Cessnock City Council v McCudden.

Australia
January 11, 2010

ENG THYE PLANTATIONS BHD v LIM HENG HOCK & ORS.

Malaysia
July 2, 2001

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; Friends of the Santa Clara River, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, Cemex Inc., a Louisiana Corporation qualified to do business in California f/k/a Southdown Inc. d/b/a Transit Mixed Concrete (TMC), Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee.

United States of America
May 6, 2006

Pacific Rivers Council v. US Forest Service.

United States of America
February 3, 2012

Beaverford v. Thorhild (County No. 7).

Edmonton
Canada
March 28, 2012

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Next page ››
Supported by the InforMEA project This website is supported by and contributing to the InforMEA Project which is funded by the European Union
This website was funded
by the European Union