Skip to main content
Home UNEP Judicial Portal

For judges by judges in support of environmental issues

Main navigation

  • Jurisprudence
    • Browse jurisprudence
    • Submit Jurisprudence
  • Judicial Network
  • Glossary
  • Resources
    • E-Learning
    • Training materials
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Legislation

User account menu

  • Log in

Glossary

Evidence

Related jurisprudence

R v Ezeemo

London
United Kingdom
January 15, 2013

SHELL OIL COMPANY, SWEPI LP D/B/A SHELL WESTERN E&P, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO SHELL WESTERN E&P, INC., PETITIONERS, v RALPH ROSS, RESPONDENT.

United States of America
December 16, 2011

KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff-Appellant v UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, MARGARET BOLAND, Defendants-Appellees and THE NEW 49’ERS, INC., RAYMOND W. KOONS, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees.

United States of America
April 7, 2011

THOMAS BOLLAY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, Defendant and Respondent; CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Sacramento
United States of America
March 1, 2011

Prince v. Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board).

Edmonton
Canada
July 2, 2010

Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney.

Australia
February 18, 2011

Myers v South Gippsland SC (No 2).

Victoria
Australia
November 23, 2009

Knight v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor.

London
United Kingdom
December 8, 2009

Baxter v Tasman District Council.

Wellington
New Zealand
January 19, 2011

Squid Fishery Management Company Limited Appellant, and Minister of Fisheries, First Respondent, and Chief Executive of Ministry of Fisheries, Second Respondent

Wellington
New Zealand
July 13, 2004

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Next page ››
Supported by the InforMEA project This website is supported by and contributing to the InforMEA Project which is funded by the European Union
This website was funded
by the European Union