Date of text
Sources
CURIA
Court name
CJEU - Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 October 2003
Free tags
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations
Directive 91/676/EEC
Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources
Article 5(4) and (5), paragraphs A(1), (2), (4) and (6) of Annex II and paragraph 1(2) and (3) and paragraph 2 of Annex III
Capacity of storage vessels for livestock manure
Limitation of the land application of fertilisers based on a balance between the foreseeable nitrogen requirements of crops and the nitrogen supply to crops from the soil and from fertilisation
Ensuring that the amount of livestock manure applied to land each year does not exceed a specified amount per hectare
Provisions contained in a code of good agricultural practice and covering periods, conditions and procedures for the land application of fertilisers
Obligation to adopt any additional measures or reinforced actions necessary
Abstract
«(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 91/676/EEC – Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources – Article 5(4) and (5), paragraphs A(1), (2), (4) and (6) of Annex II and paragraph 1(2) and (3) and paragraph 2 of Annex III – Capacity of storage vessels for livestock manure – Limitation of the land application of fertilisers based on a balance between the foreseeable nitrogen requirements of crops and the nitrogen supply to crops from the soil and from fertilisation – Ensuring that the amount of livestock manure applied to land each year does not exceed a specified amount per hectare – Provisions contained in a code of good agricultural practice and covering periods, conditions and procedures for the land application of fertilisers – Obligation to adopt any additional measures or reinforced actions necessary)» JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 2 October 2003 (1) ((Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Directive 91/676/EEC – Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources – Article 5(4) and (5), paragraphs A(1), (2), (4) and (6) of Annex II and paragraph 1(2) and (3) and paragraph 2 of Annex III – Capacity of storage vessels for livestock manure – Limitation of the land application of fertilisers based on a balance between the foreseeable nitrogen requirements of crops and the nitrogen supply to crops from the soil and from fertilisation – Ensuring that the amount of livestock manure applied to land each year does not exceed a specified amount per hectare – Provisions contained in a code of good agricultural practice and covering periods, conditions and procedures for the land application of fertilisers – Obligation to adopt any additional measures or reinforced actions necessary)) applicant, v defendant, THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),, having regard to the Report for the Hearing, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 7 November 2002, gives the following On those grounds, THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) Puissochet Gulmann Skouris Macken Colneric R. Grass J.-P. Puissochet Registrar President of the Sixth Chamber