Date of text
Sources
CURIA
Court name
CJEU - Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2003
Link to full text
Relations to other existing Court Decisions from portal Judicial
Abstract
«(Approximation of laws – Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC – Meaning of waste – Production residue – Mine – Use – Storage – Article 2(1)(b) – Meaning of other legislation – National legislation outside the framework of Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC)»
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 11 September 2003 (1)
((Approximation of laws – Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC – Meaning of waste – Production residue – Mine – Use – Storage – Article 2(1)(b) – Meaning of other legislation – National legislation outside the framework of Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC))
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of AvestaPolarit Chrome Oy, represented by A. Kukkonen; the Finnish Government, represented by T. Pynnä; the Netherlands Government, represented by N.A.J. Bel, acting as Agent; the United Kingdom Government, represented by C. Vajda; and the Commission, represented by R. Wainwright and I. Koskinen, at the hearing on 23 January 2003,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 10 April 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
Puissochet
Schintgen
Skouris
Macken
Cunha Rodrigues
R. Grass
J.-P. Puissochet
Registrar
President of the Sixth Chamber