Date of text
Sources
CURIA
Court name
CJEU - Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2004
Link to full text
Relations to other existing Court Decisions from portal Judicial
Abstract
Case C-472/02
Siomab SA
v
Institut bruxellois pour la gestion de l’environnement
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles)
(Environment – Waste – Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 on shipments of waste – Competence of the authority of dispatch to verify the classification of the purpose of a shipment (recovery or disposal) and to object to a shipment based on an incorrect classification – Objection procedure)
Summary of the Judgment
Environment – Waste – Regulation No 259/93 on shipments of waste – Shipments of waste for recovery – Incorrect classification of a planned shipment by the notifier – Not competent for the authority of dispatch to reclassify that shipment on its own initiative and to refuse to transmit the consignment note – Duty of that authority to inform the notifier of its objections to that classification
(Council Regulation No 259/93 Arts 6(8) and 7(2))
Regulation No 259/93 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community, as amended by Decisions 98/368 and 1999/816, is to be interpreted as meaning that, where a Member State has recourse, under Article 6(8) of that regulation, to the specific procedure whereby the competent authority of dispatch may transmit the consignment note for a shipment of waste for recovery itself, instead of the notifier, to the competent authority of destination, that competent authority of dispatch, if it considers it necessary to object to the shipment on the ground that it has been incorrectly classified by the notifier, may not reclassify the shipment on its own initiative. It is required to transmit that document to the other competent authorities and to the consignee and to inform the notifier and the other competent authorities concerned of its objection by any appropriate means before the end of the period laid down in Article 7(2) of the regulation at the latest.
(see para. 35, operative part)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 19 October 2004(1)
(Environment – Waste – Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 on shipments of waste – Competence of the authority of dispatch to verify the classification of the purpose of a shipment (recovery or disposal) and to object to a shipment based on an incorrect classification – Objection procedure)
v
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 15 July 2004,
gives the following