Original language

English

Country
United States of America
Date of text
Status
Unknown
Type of court
National - higher court
Sources
Court name
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia
Reference number
No. 05-1097
Free tags
Legal questions
Energy
Waste & hazardous substances
Justice(s)
Rogers, Tatel and Brown.
Abstract
In an earlier decision in this case, New Jersey v. EPA, 663 F.3d 1279 (D.C. Cir. 2011), the Appeals Court held that Movants, a group of Native American tribes and tribal associations who intervened on behalf of petitioners in the underlying Clean Air Act litigation, were entitled to fees and costs under section 307(f) of the Act. When the parties were unable to agree on the amount of fees, Movants filed an updated motion seeking $369,027.25, including compensation for 1,181 hours of work and for costs. For the reasons set forth below, the Court agreed with EPA that the fee request was excessive and thus awarded substantially less than Movants seek. The Appeals Court notes that to calculate a reasonable fee, "we use the lodestar method, multiplying a reasonable rate by the reasonable number of hours." EPA does not object to Movants' proposed hourly rates, and in order to simplify things recommends a flat rate of $305.125 which is agreed to. However, at issue is the "reasonable number of hours." After careful analysis, the Appeals Court concludes, "In sum, Movants reasonably expended 355.95 hours on the litigation. Multiplying this by $305.125 per hour, we award Movants $108,609.24 in compensation for attorney time. We also award Movants the $3,186.50 in costs they seek and that EPA does not contest."