1. Home
  2. Browse jurisprudence
  3. Jurisprudence
345 results found

Belize v. MS Westerhaven Schiffahrts et al.

Supreme Court of Belize
Belize
Tagging
Damages, Liability, Biodiversity, Property, Protected Areas, Contract, Burden of Proof, Taxation, Inspections, Wildlife
Sources
InforMEA

KV & Ors v R.

Court of Appeal
United Kingdom
Tagging
Contract, Cooperation, Permits, Prevention, Jurisdiction, Standing, Evidence
Sources
InforMEA

EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a non-profit organization, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alice B. CARLTON, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for Plumas National Forest; Randy Moore, in his official capacity as Regional Forester for Region 5 of the United States Forest Service; United States Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit
United States of America
Tagging
Forests, Wildlife, Injunctive Relief, Remedies, Biodiversity, Contract, Cooperation, Evidence, Standing
Sources
InforMEA

WILDERNESS WATCH, INC.; Arizona Wilderness Coalition; Sierra Club; Western Watersheds Project; and Grand Canyon Wildlands Council, non-profit corporations, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; H. Dale Hall, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Paul Cornes, in his official capacity as the Kofa Wildlife Refuge Manager; and Chris Pease, in his official capacity as Regional Refuge Manager, Defendants-Appellees, and U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation; Arizona Desert Big Horn Sheep Society; Arizona Deer Association; Arizona Antelope Association; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; Yuma Valley Rod & Gun Club, Inc.; Safari Club International; Safari Club International Foundation; National Rifle Association; and State of Arizona, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit
United States of America
Tagging
Wildlife, Remedies, Permits, Contract, Biodiversity, Cooperation, Evidence, Jurisdiction
Sources
InforMEA

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; Friends of the Santa Clara River, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, Cemex Inc., a Louisiana Corporation qualified to do business in California f/k/a Southdown Inc. d/b/a Transit Mixed Concrete (TMC), Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit
United States of America
Tagging
Biodiversity, Standing, Permits, Evidence, Contract, Remedies, Administrative, Wildlife, Forests
Sources
InforMEA